Listening to a portion of a speech by Mitt Romney from last night in which he pointed out that
the Wright brothers would’ve been shut down for air pollution and Thomas Edison’s
light bulb would have been/has been banned, I realized that when I can’t see
Romney but can only listen… I hear a presidential
person speaking in the quality of his statements, words and intentions. I have not been a Romney fan - but is it possible
that I was turned away from him as a candidate in large part because he looks
too smooth, too put together? Have I
fallen victim to a reverse type of negative judging of a person with too many
positive features? Have we moved to a
place in society where we now have to strive not for perfection in aesthetics,
as previously pushed, but to some new, largely unattainable, middle ground
balancing act of perfectly mediocre? Is
this life in HD where by seeing everyone’s flaws clearly we’re only comfortable
with that by seeing EVERYONE’S flaws, real or imagined? Do we all have to have
just the right amount of tarnish to be labeled acceptable? Are the common thoughts running through all
our brains now-a-days about random strangers that we have no inkling of their
past something along the lines of: “look
at her, blonde perfect hair, size 2 dress, TCU sticker on her BMW – she is such
a bitch… Bet she only hob nobs with the
elites. Screw her, I hope her and all
her sorority sisters get fat.” “Look at him, cocky mother-f***er. Perfect abs, perfect hair. Perfect Audi. I
could NEVER relate to his ‘perfect’ world.”
We all are painfully aware of the negative stereotyping of
our poorer fellows, fatter fellows, etc. and for the most part our democratic,
totally P.C. populace, have strived to quit pigeon-holing people in this
way. Heck, we even have McDonald’s
commercials celebrating, as is fair and appropriate, the rise of many a burger
flipper to a college graduate. So why
are we so vehemently trying to tear down those that are succeeding? So many of these people who have striven for perfection
are now finding themselves constantly being hated. I’m not excusing those upper elites that we’ve
always had with us who act as if the rest of humanity are here to serve them
but I am saying that there are many, many of us out there who, in large part
due to our past successes as a nation and also due to our individual personal
and remarkable achievements, have finally arrived at the goal of success,
whether financial or even physical, only to find chastisement and disbelief in
our goodness. We are left in a
quasi-middle class, upper class level that actually doesn’t exist – so alone. And it doesn’t seem so much to me to actually
have to do with what’s in our bank accounts as much as what’s in our work
ethics that have led to our achievements.
Is any of this making sense? Does
anyone else get what I’m saying? Maybe
Mitt Romney is only an upper echelon yuppie pretty boy. Maybe he just isn’t
gritty enough to be president of the United States. Maybe he has too much money to relate to any
of us. But maybe he deserves a second
glance, or let me say, a second hearing. I don’t know how hard he’s worked for his integrity. Do you? Or maybe his voice is just too perfect and I’m
a fool. I don’t really know if he’s my
candidate and I’m not really talking about the presidential election here. I’m just amazed at how wide-spread this
American problem of judgment has gone. Top to bottom and back again.
No comments:
Post a Comment